What happens when a leader stops micro managing his or her team?
Either:
- They fail
- Nothing changes
- They shine
What’s the net effect?
- If they fail, the team starts over and tries again. Some of the best recoveries come after failures.
- If nothing changes, no harm, no foul.
- If they shine, the team rejoices, they are eager to try again, and the leader reaps the lasting rewards.
Which do you choose?
What are your thoughts?
For more thoughts on Innovation, click HERE.
And think about it from the perspective of the employee/follower. Sometimes it’s easy to get addicted to being micro-managed since it takes away any sense of responsibility; that is, if I screw up, I’m not responsible, my boss is. So there’s no fear of failure. Furthermore, there’s no reason to make any tough decisions (which would certainly bring a reward) because there’s no sense of having the authority to do so. I’d use the word “stuckness” to describe that.
.-= Steven Rossi´s last blog ..Seriously New York Times? Sign in to Share? =-.
Steven, I like the reverse thought. Stuckness is a good way to describe it.