Skip to main content

I encounter many leaders who claim to want delegation to be a part of their leadership. They know the value, but they are often frustrated with the results they receive on delegated projects. As a result, they tend to control the project, which isn’t really delegation, or they simply do everything themselves.

A leader may feel they have done their job simply by giving someone an assignment. They then blame the delegate if things aren’t done as they expected.

The delegate often feels overwhelmed, unprepared, or not supported or controlled, and passes blame to the delegator who dumped them with responsibility or would never allow them to do the work in their way.

Both sides are frustrating.

Many times the problem rests with the way a project was delegated from the beginning. There are certainly times when the delegate drops the ball and doesn’t follow through with the task, but in my experience, the failure of delegation most often rests with the leader.

Here are 5 reasons delegation fails:

A predetermined win was never clear or understood.

Everyone needs to be on the same page as to what is trying to be accomplished. If done well – what would a “win” look like? What’s the goal? Further, there should be accountability in place prior to delegation. When someone receives a project, they need to be given a timeline for completion. They need a system of follow up, measures of accomplishment or benchmarks towards completion.

The leader dumped or controlled instead of delegated.

The leader retains a level of responsibility to check in periodically with the delegate’s progress, but at the same time, there is a release of direct oversight which needs to take place. The delegate should feel freedom to accomplish the predetermined objective in their own way. There’s a balance and partnership in a healthy delegation process, where the leader remains close enough to assure completion, but distant enough to let people do their work.

The delegate was not properly prepared.

Simply assuming someone knows how to do a task and can figure out their way on their own isn’t only naive it’s unfair. Questions need to be asked and information given on the front end to make sure the person has the ability to complete the task or the ability to learn along the way. This may involve the leader spending more time in the beginning phases of a task to ensure completion is attainable by the delegate. Specialized training may be needed. In fact, a failed delegation may be just the experience someone needs to do a better job next time.

Adequate resources were not in place.

It’s difficult to expect someone to complete a task when the leader hasn’t given the proper tools for the job. Sometimes anxious leaders delegate a project too soon, before the team is ready, either in structure, people power or resources.

The wrong person was chosen for the task.

Let’s face it. Not everyone is up to every task. Many times delegation fails because the leader picked the wrong person for the job. Selecting the best person on the front end or reassigning when an improper fit is discovered is critical to assure completion of a task.

Do you have delegated projects that didn’t get completed this past year? Could one of these be the reason? If so, who needs to take responsibility for the failure?

Related Posts

Ron Edmondson

Author Ron Edmondson

More posts by Ron Edmondson

Comments (15)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Hey Ron,
Yeah, this is a good list. I would say that I have to learn to do a better job at #3. I have very uniquely qualified people that I supervise and sometimes I assume that they know what I want and can get the job done. Sometimes it's all about a word of encouragement while they are working towards their goals!
1 reply · active 463 weeks ago
Just so you know....that's probably my weakest area also.
This is good stuff. Thanks for sharing!
Another factor I've seen (that is closely related to many that you named) is a leader who is both unfamiliar with the specific time commitment that a project will take and the current obligations that the delegate is already handling. It's unrealistic, in my opinion, to expect a leader to know the details of their team's schedules - so I think the best solution is just good communication.
I've seen this delegation breakdown in multiple settings.

Another thing I've noticed is leaders who delegate work but not authority. They end up tying up a lot of resources in red tape instead of empowering their organization to accomplish more.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
These are very good. Thank you.
I was just thinking of writing a blog post on "dumping" vs "delegating".... good stuff Pastor Ron
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
Thanks. Don't think we could have too many.

5 ways to take back a delegated project | Ron Edmondson

[...] will eliminate much of the need to take back a project. You can read more about healthy delegation HERE and HERE, but basically, try to help. This can happen at any stage in the project, but ideally [...]
Ron - These are very good points about delegation. With #2 I think you hit the bullseye. Too many times I felt that way like people were dumping stuff on me, rather than delegating. A very subtle difference, but a very important one!
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
Thank you so much!

5 Ways to Increase Productivity | Ron Edmondson

[...] power of delegating, learning how to delegate, and actually letting go. For more on delegating, see HERE and the “Related [...]
Ron, great post! I have always struggled with delegation as a leader, but I agree that delegation has to be wrapped in a strategy. Most of the delegation I did early on was like throwing the scraps that I didn't want to others instead of inviting them to the table and asking them to participate in the meal. I learned that if people are going to feel truly valued, they are going to need something more to bite into than just breadcrumbs from my to do list.
1 reply · active 510 weeks ago
Thanks for your honesty. Good comment.

Post a new comment

Comments by